Subject:
|
Re: Science and beliefs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:18:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
622 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
>
> A few other basic problems with the literality of the Bible:
>
> - Which translation?
>
> - How do you reconcile the apparent contradictions? Would someone care
> to list them (I'm affraid I'm not a student of the Bible and therefore
> can't list them all though I have heard them stated)?
That would be a long list. Just for starters:
King James Version
New King James Version
Aramaic Bible
Revised Standard Version
The Book of the Law of the Lord, 1856 Edition
The Douay-Rheims Bible
New International Version
New American Standard Bible
New International Version Bible
Revised Standard Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
Worldwide English (New Testament)
21st Century King James Version
World English Bible
Just to name a few................
Katie
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)
|
| (...) A few other basic problems with the literality of the Bible: - Which translation? - How do you reconcile the apparent contradictions? Would someone care to list them (I'm affraid I'm not a student of the Bible and therefore can't list them all (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
126 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
