 | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | (...) No, not really. (...) You make it sound as if I've gone to some great length to hide my identity. A couple weeks ago I posted some links to pictures of some of my models, two new, and one old. So anyone following my work would obviously know (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Just try & cool it Robert. It may sound like that to you, but yours is only one opinion. (...) No, some may have followed your links - that doesn't imply they know who you are. ROSCO (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) I'm tryin to keep things as cool as possible, if any serious debate starts over it I'm not going to get involved, there's no need. To me this group is just a fun place to yammer back and forth over stuff that probably isn't taken too (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
