 | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Jason Maxwell
| | | | (...) There was a long discussion on this in various Harry Potter web locations. Yahoo Groups is where I saw it. Anyway, they came up with multiple uses of the word Muggle going back at least 50 years. Jason (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) That's wild. I guess my question is whether there's an established context of use for the word, or if it's just out there in the world. I mean, I'm sure someone in history, while wielding his non-cumbersome sword, might have commented "Gee, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: What's in a name? ( Potter, Plagiarism, and Trademark) —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: If the word exists, that's one thing, but (...) Yes, Lego would have a case because it would create confusion in the public's mind. Less clear cut would be a recording company and a computer (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: What's in a name? ( Potter, Plagiarism, and Trademark) —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Or, for example, a boy wizard and a boy wizard? 8^) Dave! (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
