 | | A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | <slrn7k3ois.1dt.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> <FBy91u.K5w@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) You came late but your statement above is the crux of the debate. A lot of people do not buy this link, do (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) What can change the opinions? I know that in discussions, I have changed my mind on stances, but I can't isolate the essential element of what convinced me - beyond inarguable logic. But why is it that with pretty similar backgrounds, we see (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <Snipped a bunch of stuff> Larry, you are correct in saying that very few opinions will be changed as a result of the debating that is currently raging withing this group. The reason that I debate (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page —Martin Legault
|
| | | | (...) number (...) I feel happy to know another (1) american that is not "gun crazy". Some time poeple realy realy want to do or own wathever they want that they will find any excuse possible to validate their choice even if they now that they are (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
