Subject:
|
Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 May 1999 13:55:11 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu&spamcake&
|
Viewed:
|
1072 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> Know what? I've got my opinion of which one or more (if any) of the
> above is valid. Most of the readers of this whole thread know what it
> is. They also know what their own opinion is on all three. I suspect
> that nothing that anyone said here changed the opinion of anyone. Still,
What can change the opinions? I know that in discussions, I have
changed my mind on stances, but I can't isolate the essential element of
what convinced me - beyond inarguable logic. But why is it that with
pretty similar backgrounds, we see different things? I don't mean you
(Larry) and I (because we almost completely agree - on the issues
discussed recently anyway), but folks in general? Why is it completely
obvious to me (right or wrong) that the right to own weaponry is
essential to _all_ other freedoms, but not to everyone else? I say
completely obvious because it doesn't even feel like an opinion - it
feels like a truth. (Maybe that's why I won't change my mind.) I
apologize if this is rambling, but it's a serious question if anyone
wants to address it.
> Nothing will change and I'm sorry I set it off. Keep debating though...
'Cause it's entertaining for you to read at lunch time?
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
