| | Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today Dave Schuler
|
| | (...) Just for my own edification, has there ever been an official pronunciation proclamation by LEGO (which, if not for the pronuciation they use, could arguably rhyme with "ego" despite its etymology) as to which is the correct way to say Technic (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) For that matter, has there ever been an official pronunciation proclamation by LEGO to prove that their product is pronounced (leh-goh) as opposed to (lee-goh) or even (lay-goh) ? I follow the course of logic that: Technical = (tek-nik-al) and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Phrenetic Phonetics Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) 8^) Not me. My first exposure to "Technic" was in the form of "Technics," pronounced "teck-neeks" by a salesperson at a stereo store. Dave! (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Phrenetic Phonetics Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Wow, another person who pronounces it wrong. :^P I can't find anything in the dictionary that's spelled "Technic" and pronounced (tek-neek) ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Phrenetic Phonetics Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) That's tres chic of you. 8^) Dave! FUT OT.Fun (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |