 | | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!! —Aaron West
| | | | (...) You know, looking at this as "the consumer who reaches the underwear department after Richard", it would make me kind of sick. The impression would be that someone went to the dressing room with said three-pack of underwear and tried them on! (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!! —Lindsay Frederick Braun
| | | | | (...) Sans quite that invective, I agree. Yeah, it sucks that they don't make the assortment you want, but it's selfish, crude, and technically illegal to go about opening packages. It's called product tampering at the very least, theft and fraud at (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | My Underwear Buying Philosophy! (Re: was -- er whatever...) —Richard Marchetti
| | | | | You know, you guys really need to get out more. You're worried about my *touching* a rolled up undergarment as if I could infect it or something? Let's talk about ladies underwear for a second...most of the women's undergarments for sale in stores (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
