 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Rearranged to make points and snipped almost at whim. (...) Which has been done. You don't accept it. Not our problem. But the evidence is out there, and has been studied and researched for decades. Centuries in some cases. Your response to any (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) And now can we finally end this "debate" (I argue that it is not in fact a debate). I rest my case that certain Christians (which seem to comprise the set of bible literalists) can not productively participate in a debate about certain aspects (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) What have I denied or claimed inapplicable? I've been presented only with some specialized snippets which I've ignored because they're based upon more foundational things which I'm asking for evidence about. Why is it (seemingly) such a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
