 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) I believe, given my time limits, it's far easier to adopt Tim's methodology - cite a concise preexisting answer. Why is Christianity supreme? - Why is it different? (URL) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) rhetoric (ie: propaganda), this page states in essence that Christianity (the religion that worships Christ) is the greatest religion because it worships Christ. Dave! (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) copyright, but I'll try to summarize as best possible. Statement: Christianity is unique Rebuttal: No quarrel yet. It is unique. But so is Buddhism. Uniqueness does not imply correctness. S: Its claim of necessity is grounded on strong (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Thanks for summarizing, Dave!. I find Jon and Tim's references hard slogging for the most part, since they're obviously written for uncritical thinkers. They tend to be a tough read for anyone else. Of course, I personally have to disagree (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Well, there you have it, straight from the great Lar's keyboard. And remember, Lar never makes misteaks... Frank (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
