Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:35:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1396 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> The point I'm pretty sure you're trying to avoid getting me to talk you
> into, though, is that science==faith, religion==faith, and therefore
> science==religion, yes? Well, I'm not about to say that exactly.
That IS exactly what you are trying to say. You are welcome to correct me,
but then explain what you are trying to do, since your initial point was
that science is based on faith (at some point) and religion is based on
faith, so they aren't that different.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) Aha! EXACTLY the point. "Proof enough for YOU" != "Proof". Right? Becuase if I say God exists because I've had "Proof enough for ME", you'd argue that I was wrong, I assume. But back to Brazil-- You'd probably concede (I hope) that if there (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
