Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:04:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1553 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > > No, evolution didn't happen.
> > >
> > > As Sherlock Holmes states - or is attributed to have said,
> > > "After you eliminate the impossible whatever you are left with, however
> > > improbable, must be the answer."
> >
> > Sherlock is a fictional character, not a scientist (and I suppose I
> > shouldn't mention Piltdown Man and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in the same
> > breath). :-O
>
> Way off topic here...
> I suppose you thought that I believed the SH was real? hardly - Piltdown
> wasn't either... - But we all know that too. But he was more of a pig than
> SH :-)
>
> -Jon
If it's way off topicn then why do you bring it up?
You suppose incorrectly. I was pointing out that you were using a fictional
character to attempt to make a scientific point - a character written by the
man who may (or maybe not, lotsa noise, little surety) have been behind the
Piltdown Hoax, the man who wrote "The Lost World", to make a point about
evolution. I simply find it hugely ironic. :-)
Bruce
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) Ironic it may be... but what is fundamentally wrong with the statement? ... "After you eliminate the impossible whatever you are left with, however improbable, must be the answer." seems like a reasonable statement, whatever the source, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
