Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:41:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1476 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> And why is that any more probable than Evolution?
Er - I thought this was the "visiting God" thread?!
-Jon
>
> Jon Kozan wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> >
> > > OK, I admit:
> > > 1 - IF God exists (I have faith he DOESN'T)
> > > 2 - someone MIGHT be able to visit him physically
> > > 3 - show me someone who has.
> >
> > FWIW, the Christian view is that God exists everywhere He wants to since he • is
> > not contained in a physical body such as we are, thus to state to "visit" • Him,
> > doesn't understand the situation.
> >
> > He did, once, take on the form of man when Jesus came to earth.
> >
> > That's what Christians believe.
> > -Jon
>
> --
> | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
> | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) Okay; then why is your view any more likely than the Cosmic Egg doctrine of creation, or any other cosmogony? FWIW, Tom and I are not Christian (no kidding, right?), and I for one will not accept the Christian notion of God until it can be (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
