To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8800
8799  |  8801
Subject: 
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:45:54 GMT
Viewed: 
1607 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:

You're quibbling.  In that case, Tom might begin, for instance, by
asserting either that God does not exist, or that God does exist, but he
exists in a place physically inaccessible to us.  In either case we cannot
physically travel to God.
Now, I suspect that you, or someone else, will question those two
hypothetical examples of ways God might be impossible to visit physically,
so I ask again that someone provide a demonstrable way in which we can visit
Him.

AAAAARRRGGGGGHHHHHH!  (I had to get that off my chest.)
You're missing the point.

  Well, lighten up, because both of the above were hypothetical assertions
under which one might be able to say conclusively that God cannot be
physically visited.  I was *not* categorically stating that God does not exist.
  You're missing the point.

     Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) So, did you snip my arguments to pick a nit because you agree with them, because you can't refute them, or because you're ignoring them? James 1: Or rather on "somone", before that nit gets picked. (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
Wow, this thread is fast becoming hard to track! :) (...) Maybe you changed the point, Dave, but just to backtrack: James: (...) Tom: (...) James: (...) Tom: (...) DaveE: (...) Basically, the point was, what makes proving Brazil different from (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
 
(...) AAAAARRRGGGGGHHHHHH! (I had to get that off my chest.) You're missing the point. You cannot catagorically state something as true OR false when there is no evidence to support or deny it. Lacking evidence either way, saying "God does not (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR