 | | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) As he enjoys playing to the crowd. (...) I _feel_ the contrary. I have promised many times to leave LP alone - if he does the same with me. However, I feel he just can't resist taking a shot at me. Look at this thread – the message he just (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Is it necessary to make this a conditional promise? Can't each involved party rise to the moral high ground and ignore the other? (...) That comes from driving on the wrong side of the road and using that crazy metric system of yours. 8^) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Call it MAD (mutually assured destruction). (...) Ah Dave – very topical. Thirt years on, some of us Brits have still not went metric: Grocer trial told of 'metric threat' (URL) the US, you have your gun debate – we have this! Scott A (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) After Scott beat me up for not answering it. Not just once or twice, either. Make up your mind, Scott, did you want it answered or not? ++Lar (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) What are your thoughts on this? Are you willing to set aside your snide remarks? (...) Larry, It goes without saying that there many questions which on which I’d like to hear you opinions. Such as: (URL) I re-stated again the question to you (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
