Subject:
|
Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:28:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
826 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott A wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Culberson writes:
> >
> >
> > Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > >
> > > Call the question.
> >
> > Thanks Larry....agree with most of your post except...
> >
> > > militia in a free society? (or even in Canada, not quite free at this time)
> > > I'm confused.
> >
> > Yes, you are correct. However, I must point out that we're probably the
> > most free non-free nation in the world. For all intents and purposes we
> > consider ourselves free:
>
> Free to do what exactly?
Free in the sense that we're a free nation free to do what we want
without a monarch or dictator telling us what to do. The reason that
Canada isn't actually technically free is because the Queen still has
the power to have the last say in a government issue (new law, etc etc)
- but that's basically a formality.
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) It is pretty much the same here - she only really acts on the advice of the privy council (politicians). If she ever where to speak on a political issue, I think she'd find her self out of a job. The closest we get the "Royals" medalling in (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
