Subject:
|
Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:12:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
610 times
|
| |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
>
> That's why I think parts of the law are -stupid-, but parts of it to my mind
> make sense- such as requiring licences that have as a requirement, training.
Well I guess that you and I aren't acutally debating that much then
since my original post to start this thread was arguing specifically the
new gun registration laws. Requirements for a liscence and training are
and have been for at least a few a years already part of the law to at
LEAST buy firearms.
The only problem that I had when they brought in mandatory firearms
training was when they made EVERYONE including those who had owned
firearms and such for years take a course (which they had to pay for)
and so forth. I do not have a problem with the requirement for firearm
training (although I do have issues with some of the BS IN the course)
nor the requirement to have a liscence to PURCHASE NEW firearms (not for
someone to simply "possess" them - eventually in 20 or 30 years that
would lead to almost all gun owners having a liscence anyways).
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) That's why I think parts of the law are -stupid-, but parts of it to my mind make sense- such as requiring licences that have as a requirement, training. It comes down to the fact that we needed some changes to the law, but what we got was (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
