To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8595
8594  |  8596
Subject: 
Re: My Gun Control Rant
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:49:20 GMT
Viewed: 
553 times
  
James Powell wrote:

No other reason was worth pointing the firearm at them, even though you might
not HAVE to kill them to get them to do what you wanted.

I think we're arguing about a matter of wording here - While it is true
that you should never point a gun at a person without AT LEAST being in
a state where it is "OK" _IF_ the gun does get fired and does kill (in a
situation where the other dude has a gun etc etc), you DO NOT have to
have the specific INTENT to kill upon drawing the gun - I think most
would agree that if the villain (for lack of a better word?)
surrenders/leaves upon having the weapon drawn on him/her, it probably
isn't a good idea to kill them.

-and for all of those, I can think of better items- except perhaps the sporting
goods.  I'm NOT arguing about banning longs, they have ligitimate uses.  I'm
not even arging that banning all pistols is a good idea- just that limiting
access is a perfectly ligitimate act of law passed by the Canadian Government,
who are not encumbered by the (american) 2nd amendment. (and disagree with that
if you want, but I see it as being perfectly reasonable to do some of what is
banned by the 2nd in the US)

But who are we limitng access for?  There will ALWAYS be an illegal
underground firearm market where criminals will go for the weapons - the
new gun control laws are only limiting law abiding citizens access.


--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: My Gun Control Rant
 
(...) That's why I think parts of the law are -stupid-, but parts of it to my mind make sense- such as requiring licences that have as a requirement, training. It comes down to the fact that we needed some changes to the law, but what we got was (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My Gun Control Rant
 
(...) Well, I believe the technical term here in Canada is Attempted Murder, or at least Assault with a Weapon. My firearms instructors included members who had served in all kinds of nice international vacation spots, such as Cyprus, Yogo, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR