To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8595
8594  |  8596
Subject: 
Re: My Gun Control Rant
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:49:20 GMT
Viewed: 
2035 times
  
James Powell wrote:
> 
> No other reason was worth pointing the firearm at them, even though you might
> not HAVE to kill them to get them to do what you wanted.

I think we're arguing about a matter of wording here - While it is true
that you should never point a gun at a person without AT LEAST being in
a state where it is "OK" _IF_ the gun does get fired and does kill (in a
situation where the other dude has a gun etc etc), you DO NOT have to
have the specific INTENT to kill upon drawing the gun - I think most
would agree that if the villain (for lack of a better word?)
surrenders/leaves upon having the weapon drawn on him/her, it probably
isn't a good idea to kill them.

> -and for all of those, I can think of better items- except perhaps the sporting
> goods.  I'm NOT arguing about banning longs, they have ligitimate uses.  I'm
> not even arging that banning all pistols is a good idea- just that limiting
> access is a perfectly ligitimate act of law passed by the Canadian Government,
> who are not encumbered by the (american) 2nd amendment. (and disagree with that
> if you want, but I see it as being perfectly reasonable to do some of what is
> banned by the 2nd in the US)

But who are we limitng access for?  There will ALWAYS be an illegal
underground firearm market where criminals will go for the weapons - the
new gun control laws are only limiting law abiding citizens access.


--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: My Gun Control Rant
 
(...) That's why I think parts of the law are -stupid-, but parts of it to my mind make sense- such as requiring licences that have as a requirement, training. It comes down to the fact that we needed some changes to the law, but what we got was (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My Gun Control Rant
 
(...) Well, I believe the technical term here in Canada is Attempted Murder, or at least Assault with a Weapon. My firearms instructors included members who had served in all kinds of nice international vacation spots, such as Cyprus, Yogo, (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR