 | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Remember though, that that kind of evidence is by definition not possible, so it's true that there would be no way to convince you. (...) I was just thinking that, if I were God, how *would* I convince you that I existed? (and how much LEGO I (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Since I point that out in the next paragraph but one, you can be sure I was aware of it. A danger of starting to respond before you read the whole thing... :-) as Paul B pointed out. In fact, "unconvincability" is kind of the whole point of (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) Don't know what made me think of this just now, but when I first saw the thread entitled "LP point 1", etc, I had interpreted the LP as "Larry Pieniazek" rather than "Libertarian Party". :) DaveE (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Is that from something? Chris (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) No, I made it up as an example of the sort of "miracle" one sometimes hears proffered, but exaggerated in the mundane direction for effect. ++Lar (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
