Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:55:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
995 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Chapple writes:
> _Somewhat_ circular, yes,
Any circularity whatever is sufficient to disqualify a particular item of
evidence.
> but the Bible isn't the sole "proof of God".
> The most obvious evidence of the Creator being His creation.
No one in this forum (or elsewhere) has yet demonstrated a proof to my
satisfaction using this basis, although it's been tried.
I feel like a taxonomy of proofs is needed. A reference to one was given in
the past. You're on very plowed ground here, visiting each attempted proof
in turn, and not grasping the meta argument that is being made yet, which
that christianity is inherently unprovable using objective verifiable means.
Most other christians here acknowledge that, and argue for christianity
through other mechanisms.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
