| |
You are wasting my time Larry. Go back and reply to my full text - do not
conveniently delete text to suite _your_ point. This discussion is about a
point I raised - do me the decency of answering it, rather than raising
issues of your own - or deliberately misenterpreting me. I have no problem
putting you straight on your views below – but I refuse to do so when you
continually delete my points.
Scott A
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Why? Why should public/private be different?
>
> If you can't grasp the distinction here, there's not much hope
>
> > Do they not operate in the same marketplace?
>
> Nope.
>
> > Should they not compete using the same rules?
>
> Nope. Government, in view of its great competitive advantage (it *makes* the
> rules) must be tightly constrained.
>
> > Is it not your
> > normal assertion that there should be no state school system?
>
> Yes, but in cases where there is a public X and a private X, we must ensure
> strict fairness of the public X.
>
> <snipped some irrelevant blather>
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) If you can't grasp the distinction here, there's not much hope (...) Nope. (...) Nope. Government, in view of its great competitive advantage (it *makes* the rules) must be tightly constrained. (...) Yes, but in cases where there is a public X (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
