| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> Why? Why should public/private be different?
If you can't grasp the distinction here, there's not much hope
> Do they not operate in the same marketplace?
Nope.
> Should they not compete using the same rules?
Nope. Government, in view of its great competitive advantage (it *makes* the
rules) must be tightly constrained.
> Is it not your
> normal assertion that there should be no state school system?
Yes, but in cases where there is a public X and a private X, we must ensure
strict fairness of the public X.
<snipped some irrelevant blather>
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Polyamory
|
| You are wasting my time Larry. Go back and reply to my full text - do not conveniently delete text to suite _your_ point. This discussion is about a point I raised - do me the decency of answering it, rather than raising issues of your own - or (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Polyamory
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G5oq6B.9Hv@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) able (...) including (...) including (...) in (...) governments. Why? Why should public/private be different? Do they not operate in the (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
