| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> It takes >1 to debate Larry.
I'm genuinely flattered that you think that.
However it's not true. It only takes one good debater (someone who knows how
to think critically and who doesn't just *snipe*) to debate me, not an
entire team. Perhaps you're starting to feel inadequate? Too bad, you were
doing so well there for a while, but you've backslid to your old ways, as
Tom pointed out.
Or, maybe you just left a comma out. Despite my knowledge of your
characteristic sloppiness in written speech as exemplified here, my money is
on the former explanation, either done deliberately, or as a Freudian slip
on your part.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
