| |
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message
news:3A3BB6C5.A05F0963@vfaq.com...
> Scott A wrote:
>
> > > > Are you saying the board had a right to sack him as he was gay? That • is your
> > > > usual line of argument is it not?
> > >
> > > Ah, Scott, another example of uncritical thinking.
> >
> > It is the exact opposite.
> >
> > > You DO grasp the
> > > difference between public and private, as used in the US, right? OK... • more
> > > slowly.
> > >
> > > It's a public school board. If it were a private school they should be • able
> > > to enforce any behaviour standards they like on their employees, • including
> > > requiring that their teachers be gay or not be gay. But public bodies,
> > > including public schools should not be able to discriminate in that • way.
> >
> > Usually, you tell me that they should be able to. Usually you say such
> > institutions will discover such actions are bad - and the market should
> > decide. I'll ask you again, do you think any school, public or private,
> > should be able to sack a member of staff for being gay?
>
> Scott, why do you waste everyone's time with totally useless questions?
>
> This is plowed ground IN THE ACTUAL POST. Larry stated quite clearly his • position. I
> don't see how much clearer it can be, and if you can't see the answer, you • really
> should just go away, because you'll be wasting everyone's time asking them • to explain
> something that is perfectly clear to any rational person (oh wait, you've • already done
> that repeatedly).
It is also not clear to me if Larry is talking about what he wants or what
is already happening. I more interested in why Larry thinks there should be
a difference.
Scott A
>
>
> --
> Tom Stangl
> ***http://www.vfaq.com/
> ***DSM Visual FAQ home
> ***http://ba.dsm.org/
> ***SF Bay Area DSMs
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) Scott, why do you waste everyone's time with totally useless questions? This is plowed ground IN THE ACTUAL POST. Larry stated quite clearly his position. I don't see how much clearer it can be, and if you can't see the answer, you really (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
