To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8125
8124  |  8126
Subject: 
Re: Polyamory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:39:01 GMT
Viewed: 
1835 times
  
Scott A wrote:

Are you saying the board had a right to sack him as he was gay? That is your
usual line of argument is it not?

Ah, Scott, another example of uncritical thinking.

It is the exact opposite.

You DO grasp the
difference between public and private, as used in the US, right? OK... more
slowly.

It's a public school board. If it were a private school they should be able
to enforce any behaviour standards they like on their employees, including
requiring that their teachers be gay or not be gay. But public bodies,
including public schools should not be able to discriminate in that way.

Usually, you tell me that they should be able to. Usually you say such
institutions will discover such actions are bad - and the market should
decide. I'll ask you again, do you think any school, public or private,
should be able to sack a member of staff for being gay?

Scott, why do you waste everyone's time with totally useless questions?

This is plowed ground IN THE ACTUAL POST.  Larry stated quite clearly his position.  I
don't see how much clearer it can be, and if you can't see the answer, you really
should just go away, because you'll be wasting everyone's time asking them to explain
something that is perfectly clear to any rational person (oh wait, you've already done
that repeatedly).


--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Polyamory
 
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3A3BB6C5.A05F09...faq.com... (...) is your (...) more (...) able (...) including (...) way. (...) position. I (...) really (...) to explain (...) already done (...) It is also not clear (...) (24 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) It is the exact opposite. (...) Usually, you tell me that they should be able to. Usually you say such institutions will discover such actions are bad - and the market should decide. I'll ask you again, do you think any school, public or (...) (24 years ago, 16-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR