To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8072
8071  |  8073
Subject: 
Re: Polyamory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:17:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1312 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

I'm against states expressing a preference one way or the other.

++Lar

State? I think you mean society.

No.

I wrote state because I meant state. Societies can't express preferences.
Members of societes can (forcibly) *impose* their preferences on other
members, through the mechanics of the state, but the society as a whole
cannot have a preference, it's not an entity capable of having preferences.

Thanks for playing, though.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) I think they can. (...) I accept that the majority in a society can implement change - we call it democracy. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) State? I think you mean society. Scott A (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR