To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8036
8035  |  8037
Subject: 
Re: Polyamory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:06:54 GMT
Viewed: 
1258 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:

First of all, what state is forcing morality on anyone?

When a state says that a contract between a man and a woman has more
standing or more importance, that is, that it is recognised as a special
kind of contract, when compared to a contract between a man and a man or a
man and two women (like i could afford THAT)... that state is expressing a
moral preference for one kind of contract compared to the other.

That is not a force, but is a preference. It can be a VERY strong preference
when one considers all the tax/benefit/custody, etc etc, ramifications...

I'm against states expressing a preference one way or the other.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) State? I think you mean society. Scott A (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) This is pretty typical of the crap that polyamorists spew in an attempt to make themselves seem enlightened. First of all, what state is forcing morality on anyone? As far as I know, in most state adultery isn't even illegal. Many religions (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR