To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8005
8004  |  8006
Subject: 
Re: Religion and Science
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 04:33:01 GMT
Viewed: 
1042 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Wilson writes:
This is not to say that well-adjusted people couldn't and don't live
happily as a single person or in open relationships (or as a triple or >>quadruple (or sextuple cf _Friends_ (and what about consensual incest >>anyway?))), just that I don't think it would work very well for most people. >
Exactly Dave. Polyamory is something suited to some people, certainly not
all, probably not most: but most people never even consider it because it's
outside the social norm. No family structure is the best for everyone, and
choices ought to be available rather than cut off for no good reason.

Although I can imagine it would make life hard for the government! "Are you
single or married? If married, to how many people of which genders?"

Kevin, do you think polyamory (where did you find that expression, btw?)
works better for non-straight people? I can imagine there's less of the
"Obey me my wives and servants" kind of thing than in most polygamous families.

--DaveL



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Polyamory
 
Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) Heheh. Might move them towards treating everyone the same, single or married! (...) There's a whole polyamory subculture. Try doing a Google search, there should be plenty of hits. I first came across the term (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Religion and Science
 
Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) happily (...) (or (...) Exactly Dave. Polyamory is something suited to some people, certainly not all, probably not most: but most people never even consider it because it's outside the social norm. No family (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR