 | | Re: New Web Page —John DiRienzo
|
| | | I just want to put my two cents on this one, whereas I will just keep my big mouth shut about the other threads... For what its worth, Mike Stanly seems to absolutely right! (again) Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) Good point, I think I will (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Web Page —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) For the record, I think that my beliefs are subject to change, but others have tried to convince me and it hasn't happened on this issue. (...) This is the key practical point, as far as I see it. (...) And this is the key ethical point which (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Web Page —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I believe it has something to do with the fact that the police are only *supposed* to be involved in situations where a crime has been committed. No crime, no punishment. Can you imagine what would happen if citizens could be punished because (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Web Page —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <373b2d40.4308071@lu...et.com>... (...) strange. (...) If our country wasn't over run by this "its not a crime unless convicted" mentality I might find this argument credible. However, so much crime occurs because it is (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Web Page —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Mike and John are doing fine. I wish I had time to participate in this debate as I usually do... it's fun. Not likely to change anyone's mind but fun. (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Web Page —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, that's why I won't be wasting much time on it. The total nuts on both sides are wrong, imo. (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
