Subject:
|
Re: Religion and Science
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:12:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
664 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> I still contend that science can't prove much since the explaination of things
> is in continual evolution as more knowledge comes in.
Science is not in the business of proving anything. Proof is not a stage in
the scientific life cycle. Scientists don't even believe in proof. Proof
isn't what we're looking for. Increasing evidence and plausibility are the
goals. This may seem like a minor point in your ongoing discussion, but I
think it's kind of the key.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Religion and Science
|
| (...) I didn't say change with the times - rather that it doesn't stagnate. I guess you could define stagnation as you will, but there are many levels of learnign and debate within the Protestant and Catholic (to name but 2) parts of Christianity (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
