| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> > As I mentioned above, there would be no central regulation. Yes you
> > would be able to just buy a degree (you can do that today). Libertopia
> > will offer more effective control because the "regulation" would be
> > subject to the free market, which would strive for the most effective
> > balance of all factors of health care (ultimately simplifying to cost of
> > care vs benefit of care).
>
> I think this sort of market control is OK when choosing a car mechanic, or
> perhaps a plumber. But to expect a trial-and-error approach to work where
> health and education are at risk is a bit much for me. What if one can't
> afford a decent doctor, would one just have find a cheaper one?
What constitutes a decent doctor? Why couldn't one just figure out if they
knew what they were talking about? What is "trial-and-error" about looking up
the Consumer Reports article on the local state of medecine? And most of all,
beyond everything else, what makes you think that a "trial-and-error" approach
a)isn't what we currently have in both medicine and education, or b)would
result in worse than what we have?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LP POINT 3.3
|
| (...) I think this sort of market control is OK when choosing a car mechanic, or perhaps a plumber. But to expect a trial-and-error approach to work where health and education are at risk is a bit much for me. What if one can't afford a decent (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
