 | | Re: Do market based societies select for virtue? (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) This is all very Hayek - he proposed that the systems of behaviour in humanity is evolving – and that they survive because they are useful, in that they help “society”. He believed that The market had survived the test of time this based on (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Do market based societies select for virtue? (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Including me, of course, as I've said all along. I'll argue for 100% (of whatever) but gladly accept 75% (instead of the 32% I have now)... Based on some of the other stuff you've posted lately I may have to become a small l libertarian (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Do market based societies select for virtue? (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) So you're aiming for 75%. I'm sure I can haggle you down a little further... Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Do market based societies select for virtue? (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) We're not haggling yet, and if we were, I'd still be aiming for 100%. :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
