To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7495
7494  |  7496
Subject: 
Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:42:17 GMT
Viewed: 
304 times
  
First off the answer is an easy yes; however, a couple of points that need
to be considered in this argument.

1. Who are we talking about when we say needy? Do we include those who
refuse to work? and who makes this determination?  My understanding of a
Libertarian society would be no public funds for welfare efforts.

2. Do not underestimate the benevolence of mankind. How many of you drop
some money into the Salvation Army bucket, or give to your church,
voluntarily. Even today in our welfare state, there are several
organizations willing to help the downtrodden, when did this become
governments concern?

Here in the United States we currently live in a welfare state, in a
Libertarian state, the needy would get nothing from the government beyond
protection. Taxes would be much lower, business would be stimulated, and
individuals would have more with which to be more generous. Government
should encourage, not require benevolence.

Scott



Message is in Reply To:
  Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
 
One of the central arguments against libertarian principles is that there will be more poor starving folks. I assert that this will not be the case. It is to my benefit that my neighbor isn't starving and desperate. If he is, he is likely to rob me. (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

231 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR