 | | Re: LP POINT 2 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) One point at a time, sorry. But in the meantime, you can either apply first principles and derive your own answer, or you can read old threads, where something very like this was discussed, at length. Check your assumptions, though. They (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 2 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This is an easy one Larry - One or Two, whats is gonna be? Would a starving man/woman have a right to food? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LP POINT 2 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) What's so hard to understand about one point at a time? Did you want to give up on your other two for now and talk about this one? I am taking them in your numbering order. This bears repeating, though... (...) as does this... (...) ++Lar (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LP POINT 2 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Larry, you are deleting my points rather than answering them. Scott A "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4p2qs.K9o@lugnet.com... (...) with (...) What (...) give (...) your (...) was (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
