Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:22:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
620 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> Obviously there's no ironclad indicator of what a drug is and isn't, and
> if you choose to define it broadly enough, light and air are both drugs.
Love is a drug and I need a fix! - Roxy Music
> Certain substances, though, have an undeniable behavior-altering aspect and
> can be distinguished from things like sugar.
Clearly you're not thoroughly Sluggish, or else you'd know that sugar is
indeed a drug when ingested by ferrets. :-)
++Lar (who didn't go door busting this year and sort of doesn't miss it!)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) That works if the "drug" user is able to make that determination and if he doesn't subsequently cause harm to others as a result of that drug use, and in any case financial/criminal penalties may simply be too after-the-fact to be of use (...) (24 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
