To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 734
733  |  735
Subject: 
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 5 May 1999 20:33:34 GMT
Viewed: 
23 times
  
<cross-posted to off-topic.debate>

In lugnet.admin.general, Simon Denscombe writes:
James Brown wrote:
no, but it could be considered defamatory.  Also, another portion of that
clause covers it quite nicely:

Well doesn't any flame-war have defamatory posts?  Especially in
off-topic-debate

Yup, they do.

"...including without limitation any transmissions constituting or • encouraging
conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil
liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, national, or international
law."
The phrase above could quite happily give rise to civil liability, and odds
are it violates some law, somewhere.  (probably in California)(1)

OK, but some countries don't have the right to free speech so we can't
post at all.  I don't think that laws can affect someone's personal
point of view and their right to say it - that's going against civil
liberties isn't it?

Laws don't affect our right to say things.  Laws enforce the consequences of
our having said them.

Essentially, I think that Todd & Suzanne have been ambiguous enough to cover
all their bases, from a legal point of view.  Besides, when push comes to
shove, this is a private organization, and if racism/sexism/otherism
becomes a problem, they can change the rules to account for it.

Well it's not sexism - after all "ill people want to get well they just
don't know it" - now how is 'defamatory'

By using the term 'ill', you are implying that there is something wrong with
homosexuality, and by extension, homosexuals.  If you are not willing or able
to back up your statement with medical proof, then you are stating an negative
opinion about another person, without evidence to support your conjecture.(1)
Doesn't get much more defamatory than that.

And "ill people...know it" is so nonsensical I won't even bother to pick it
apart.

But I will re-iterate my point.  I don't think it matters.  The terms &
conditions are set up broadly enough as they stand.  If it is really that big
a deal, print them off, spend way too much money, and have a lawyer evaluate
them for you.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) OK. (...) I'll have to check the particular Terms and Conditions for off-topic.debate but I thought they were the same. Some people therefore will be breaking LUGNET rules. (...) Acknowledged but some law somewhere won't like it. (...) Well I (...) (26 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) Well doesn't any flame-war have defamatory posts? Especially in off-topic-debate (...) OK, but some countries don't have the right to free speech so we can't post at all. I don't think that laws can affect someone's personal point of view and (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR