Subject:
|
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 May 1999 23:26:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
933 times
|
| |
|
|
James Brown wrote:
> no, but it could be considered defamatory. Also, another portion of that
> clause covers it quite nicely:
Well doesn't any flame-war have defamatory posts? Especially in
off-topic-debate
> "...including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging
> conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil
> liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, national, or international
> law."
> The phrase above could quite happily give rise to civil liability, and odds
> are it violates some law, somewhere. (probably in California)(1)
OK, but some countries don't have the right to free speech so we can't
post at all. I don't think that laws can affect someone's personal
point of view and their right to say it - that's going against civil
liberties isn't it?
> Essentially, I think that Todd & Suzanne have been ambiguous enough to cover
> all their bases, from a legal point of view. Besides, when push comes to
> shove, this is a private organization, and if racism/sexism/otherism becomes a
> problem, they can change the rules to account for it.
Well it's not sexism - after all "ill people want to get well they just
don't know it" - now how is 'defamatory' ?
> James
> http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
> 1:Wait! Was that defamatory? My apologies to the state(2) of California.
You've broken some by-law somewhere like Macau.
> 2:Take that however you will.(3)
> 3:D'oh! There I go again.
Oh no! Not the footnotes - there should be something in the Terms and
Conditions about them.
--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| (...) no, but it could be considered defamatory. Also, another portion of that clause covers it quite nicely: "...including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
