Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:00:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
599 times
|
| |
|
|
Holy Cow! I'm away for a couple days and this happened...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Simpson writes:
> While it is true that a woman may do as she pleases with her own body, it does
> not therefore follow that she may do as she see's fit with her baby's body.
OK, so the woman doesn't have the right to destroy another human's body. I
understand and generally agree so far.
> IF
> a conception is the result of an un-coerced freely-made consent to sexual
> intercourse,
Waitnowholdonaminit! Now it sounds like you're saying that the woman might
have the right to destroy another human's body under certain circumstances.
How the heck to you come to that?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) I cringe at the thought of the lengths of a thread encompassing an abortion- debate. I made my abortion comment because I do not want this forum to be a place where "minority" or dissenting viewpoints (such as mine) are not tolerated. For my (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
