Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:04:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2193 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
>
>
> Scott A wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > > The whole problem of the abortion debate is that it is actually *two*
> > > debates intertwined into one. One, whether the government has the right
> > > to tell one what one can do with one's body (most would say no),
> >
> > This issue aside, I can't agree with this. Goverment should also protect us
> > from ourselves.
>
> Government should protect us from ourselves??? This is an absurd statement in
> my mind (see my statement about avoiding personal responsibility), but I sense
> a fundamental disagreement here as to the purpose of government and will agree
> to disagree.
I agree :)
>
> > If one were to decide to take ones own life, one would
> > expect "government" to get involved.
> >
> > > and
> > > whether one has the right to take the life of another (most would say
> > > no).
> >
> > Perhaps. However, a man was democratically executed in Texas last-night(?).
>
> Scott Simpson in the post above differentiates very well the difference
> between ending the life of an innocent fetus, and ending the life of a brutal
> murderer, etc. My statement assumed unjustified taking of a life. Government
> executions of convicted criminals are just (assuming a fair trial).
The problem here is what is "unjustified" to you may be OK to me - or vise
versa. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one too.
Scott A
>
> -John
>
> >
> >
> > Scott A
> >
> > >
> > > Until we can separate these two issues, the abortion debate with *never*
> > > be solved, especially in a time when our culture is so reticent to the
> > > idea of accepting personal responsibility for personal actions.
> > >
> > > -.02,
> > > John
> > >
> > > Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > >
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > >
> > > > I missed this ref, it's even better:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.lp.org/lpn/9807-pulse.html
> > > >
> > > > (note that both of these refs were found by typing "abortion" into the
> > > > search box at the bottom of the front page of the www.lp.org site...)
> > > >
> > > > I'm in the 4.9% camp at the moment.
> > > >
> > > > ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
