Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:16:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
776 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> The whole problem of the abortion debate is that it is actually *two*
> debates intertwined into one. One, whether the government has the right
> to tell one what one can do with one's body (most would say no),
This issue aside, I can't agree with this. Goverment should also protect us
from ourselves. If one were to decide to take ones own life, one would
expect "government" to get involved.
> and
> whether one has the right to take the life of another (most would say
> no).
Perhaps. However, a man was democratically executed in Texas last-night(?).
Scott A
>
> Until we can separate these two issues, the abortion debate with *never*
> be solved, especially in a time when our culture is so reticent to the
> idea of accepting personal responsibility for personal actions.
>
> -.02,
> John
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > I missed this ref, it's even better:
> >
> > http://www.lp.org/lpn/9807-pulse.html
> >
> > (note that both of these refs were found by typing "abortion" into the
> > search box at the bottom of the front page of the www.lp.org site...)
> >
> > I'm in the 4.9% camp at the moment.
> >
> > ++Lar
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
