Subject:
|
Re: Would a general/pilot in WW1............
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:38:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
244 times
|
| |
|
|
> On the other hand, a pilot was more likely to be killed
> in a *non*-combat situation than a grunt...*crunch*
>
> best
>
> LFB
Well, that's what you get when you send someone into the air with a machine
that is of dubious quality at best, and with less than 10 hrs of flying time!
(boy, lives were cheap then!)
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Would a general/pilot in WW1.........
|
| (...) I was actually including the non-combat service life with it, so in fact you may be agreeing with me here. ;) It also does shift from year to year, month to month, as aerial combat is refined and made more lethal and exhaustion sets in on the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
