 | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Paul Baulch
|
| | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) what (...) Hatter (...) lot (...) inappropriate (...) why (...) And kept it to yourself? That's a real shame. If' I'd made the connection, I would have used it constructively, to help persuade Matthew not (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Paul Baulch writes: <snip> I dispute that MM was "retrievable" or that it's my job to try. If you persist, I will politely point out what a fool you are for trying, in a friendly way, of course. I don't reason with rabid (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | Paul Baulch wrote: .... (...) .... (...) Paul I can see your point, but I strongly believe that this is not a therapy club and I think most of the people here, surely including me, would not take the job. I still believe that there is a big (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Lemme interject something here. :-) Matthew didn't make any mistakes -- at least not in the usual social faux-pas sense. I've been speaking a little bit with him offline in email since Saturday and he considers himself a "Social Engineer" (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) I must say I can't think of a place, either on or off line, where that kind of "social engineering" WOULD sit well. He must be quite used to being run out of groups on a rail... Kevin ---...--- Personal Lego Web page: (URL) Park: Limited (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I have a question (for anyone) about the phrase "Social Engineering." In your experience, does the phrase automaticaly imply causing disruptions, flamewars, etc. or can SE be done in quiet, civil ways? If the ToS for the discussion groups were (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually, that's something I considered when speaking to Matthew offline. I think my conclusion on the issue is that Matthew's approach (I.E. causing disruptions, etc) is a very fast, effective way of doing it. However, it causes unfortunate (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | I think Todd got "played". (And I recently said I didn't think Todd was easy to fool) Social Engineering my foot. If that was what MM was up to, it has no place here. But I don't think it was, I think it was just another layer of deception. This guy (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | | | This is tough but I think its a worthy discussion... (...) With all due respect to Todd, I think Larry is right to an extent. I told Todd in a private E-mail that I thought MM was mostly full of it. MM thinks very highly of himself and I would be (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) set (...) Check. Walk a mile in the other man's shoes and all that. (...) C/becuase/because/ C/to nice and/too nice and/ <GRIN> Seriously, without starting a big war, I think most of us know that you're a bit spelling challenged, Eric. And we (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) You want a war I'll give you a war... ;-). I don't pretend to be a good speller, I'm no good at the gramma stuff neither ;-). Never have been and probably never will be. I do try and (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I meant that in the nicest way, of course. (...) I think you left a comma out of that sentence fragment, big fella. :-) All (1) kidding aside (I should have set followups to .fun on the last post but they're set there now), I think if you (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well I think you probably knew what I meant in that I leave final documentation to someone else, i.e. the copy the customer sees, I have to document my code for internal purposes of course. (...) Well I am not sure but I think it was the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) <OBDisclaimer: I am not a professional sociologist, nor do I make any pretensions of actual knowledge in the field.> Social Engineering can be applied to a much broader spectrum of science and psuedo-science than MM is using it for. Not all SE (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | | (...) Of course it's your call, but I don't think it's really necessary to put something like that into TOS. Current TOS is already forbids many things involved with this recent "social engineering" issue as you called. It doesn't matter too much (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I think "Social Engineering" can mean many things. You can really only define it by its aim. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) We might be able to define it by its aim, but we can only evaluate it in terms of outcome. The recent episode may have been a noble attempt to shame us into some sort of community restructuring, but in reality Matt's posts came off as childish (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Good point. But before we can say "No Social Engineering Allowed", we have define what it is. Could it be argued that the rules of LUGNET themselves are social engineering? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Social Engineering (was: Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?)) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) define it by its aim. (...) Absolutely! They are, after all, the foundation of this community (or society?), so they would certainly qualify in my view. For that matter, the fact that LUGNet is a generally cohesive, friendly, and positive (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) (Just rereading what I wrote...) I didn't mean that to sound like everyone should have known this (what I snipped) and that Paul was wrong in what he wrote back to Larry. I just wanted to add some facts in an appropriate place to comment. No (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) I recognize that you're just the messenger, rather than the purveyor of this mindset, but such "social engineering" as Matt describes it is also known as sociopathy. The fact that it can be couched in politically correct rhetoric doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't know what else to call it. Any suggestions? (...) I really only "got" what he was trying to do after he explained it carefully. I played into his trap. Any others that come to mind? BTW, I can see that you get it. Say, do you remember (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —John Robert-Blaze Kanehl
|
| | | | | | (...) I strongly agree with this point... If I rob a bank, is it a crime?... or "a Meta-game in which I proposed to test the gullable nature of bank tellers, the resolution of low-light cameras, the competancy of local law enforcement, and the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Naturally, it could be both. It's never not a crime, of course. If someone thinks it a meta-game, they clearly think quite differently from most people. Again, I don't care to judge MM's game or meta-game or tactics (or whatever you want to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You make a good point--it's hard to claim your opponent is cheating at checkers when he's playing chess. However, it's a cheap maneuver to say after the fact that you were playing a different game all along, especially when it looks like (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | For a guy who uses WebTV, this JohnnyBlaze is pretty eloquent! In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Robert-Blaze Kanehl writes: <snip> (...) Great, memorable acronym! And a good summation. (...) This statement is brilliant! For anyone who is wondering (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: Lar, Aren't you supposed to be on a flight somewhere? Drag your armored suitcase over someone's toes and get some sleep! Dave! (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That was hours ago, I took an overnight monday nite, got to work around 1 PM GMT and did a good half day before I posted. Fortunately I got bumped from Delta onto NW, so I spent some miles to get out of coach and into Business, much better (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —John Robert-Blaze Kanehl
|
| | | | | | (...) I read the first sentence and couldn't stop laughing... Thanks for the best laugh (compliment?) all day Larry! I'll read the rest of the post as soon as I dry my eyes... John (who prefers to think of himself as a slightly evolved (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Friendliest Site On The Internet. (Was Re: A little self examination?) —Joakim Olsson
|
| | | | (...) *snipped some good stuff* (...) at (...) bit (...) his (...) absolutely (...) his (...) sociology. A vampire playing with Lego, thats a new one. That proves what a great product Lego really is... The "Malkavians" are everywhere and are famous (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
