 | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) oh - ok... you don't think Arafat want's the destruction of israel? hmmm... Arafat: [1] "Our people [are] continuing the road to Jerusalem, the capital of our independent Palestinian state," Arafat said. "To accept or not to accept it, let him (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Does this mean he wants the "destruction of israel"? (...) Is he the only one who is "double faced"? I read this yesterday on the BBC: (URL) the Israeli did not react in such a violent manner the rioting would have stopped days ago. For now, I (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm... it certanly doens't show that he want's peace, does it? (...) says right there, btw: Israelis, no matter how left-wing, cannot take Palestinian demands on par with their own because to accept Palestinian national rights is to deny (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dan Boger writes: <snip> After Scott's last message to me, I'm going to try to take my own advice and ignore him. He's just picking a fight with you and I advise you to do the same and ignore him in this thread as well... (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | I could use about 80% of this to describe you Larry. (...) There is no need to mother Dan, let him make up his own mind. After all, I think he has a real opinion on this, which is backed with understanding. I'm almost enjoying talking to him about (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) hmmm... (...) I'm sure he does want peace. Let's not doubt that. It is the terms of peace which are important. (...) What _is_ the answer then. The they are not will to treat all claims equally? (...) the (...) trying (...) A minority of those (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) I can't help but doubt that... otherwise, I truely believe there would have been progress in the peace process... (...) rephrase, please? I couldn't parse that last sentance... (...) I'll believe that when I'll see it. I doubt that he actually (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) equally? (...) Sorry, I think faster than I think at times What _is_ the answer then. If they are not willing to treat all claims equally? (...) Those guys have guns too - don't doubt it. They usually come round and shoot fathers in their beds (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
