 | | Britain's bloody hands in NI (was Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) And that majority is composed of what? Descendants of Britons who colonised, as I understand it. The Irish who got pushed off that land so the British squires could set up estates didn't exactly get much of a vote at the time. So how exactly (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) make (...) want (...) colonised, (...) So what is your answer then? NI's problem is partly that it is still living back then... in the past. (...) again? (...) Jewish (...) who (...) usurpers) (...) Even if Britain then = Israel now. Would (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) What was the question? (...) What's the point of that. (...) Didn't say it did. Recall I said I didn't think Israel should have been set up in the first place. Recall that I said that it was the UK that caused this mess. You haven't answered (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Avoidance. (...) Avoidance (...) I think I did. (...) I did not slag off the "US". I slagged of the policing undertaken by the US and its allies (inc the UK). (...) "SA: (...) LP: Not sure I agree that everything the US does externally is for (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
