 | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
Scott A wrote in message ... *I really did not want to add posts to this thread as it is feelings inolved, byt hey, I could not help myself...* <snipped> (...) Yes, especially in Northern Ireland... Wouldn´t it be greate to give that piece of the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Joakim Olsson" <jocke@arjay.nu> wrote in message news:G2uqw7.AMq@lugnet.com... (...) I have views on NI. They will remain my own for now. But the point you make is misleading. It is an accepted fact that the majority of those in NI want to be part (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) Well, you are probably right. I do not have all of the facts. Do you have all the facts regarding middle-east? Have they been able to vote about theese issues lately in NI? I know(read it in history books) in the past, that they grouped people (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Joakim Olsson" <jocke@arjay.nu> wrote in message news:G2vJIA.B55@lugnet.com... (...) that (...) make (...) want (...) They, overwhelming return pro-UK candidates in local/national/eu elections. (...) really (...) highschool, (...) You are right in (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Britain's bloody hands in NI (was Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) And that majority is composed of what? Descendants of Britons who colonised, as I understand it. The Irish who got pushed off that land so the British squires could set up estates didn't exactly get much of a vote at the time. So how exactly (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...)
|
|
(...) make (...) want (...) colonised, (...) So what is your answer then? NI's problem is partly that it is still living back then... in the past. (...) again? (...) Jewish (...) who (...) usurpers) (...) Even if Britain then = Israel now. Would (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...)
|
|
(...) What was the question? (...) What's the point of that. (...) Didn't say it did. Recall I said I didn't think Israel should have been set up in the first place. Recall that I said that it was the UK that caused this mess. You haven't answered (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: UK Happy to sign European Convention on Human Rights (was Britain's bloody... (was When is...)
|
|
(...) Avoidance. (...) Avoidance (...) I think I did. (...) I did not slag off the "US". I slagged of the policing undertaken by the US and its allies (inc the UK). (...) "SA: (...) LP: Not sure I agree that everything the US does externally is for (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) The truly frightening thing is that the "Northern Ireland Problem" has been going on since at least Elizabethan times (ie more than 400 years). Will the "Israeli/Palestine problem" continue for as long? Kevin ---...--- Personal Lego Web page: (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
