To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 644
643  |  645
Subject: 
Re: which threads, ethics vote
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:42:35 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.netSAYNOTOSPAM
Viewed: 
1161 times
  
<F8CsL7.Jq0@lugnet.com> <36E5F82E.693B3B6@voyager.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If we all use common courtesy and play well there should be no problem.
No one "owns" a thread, and no one is _not allowed_ to do what the second
poster did, and no _rules_  (or a vote) are necessary.  Suffice it to say
that he was within the rules of order to do what he did, just not within
the "rules" of etiquette.  He should have started a new thread, period.
Scott was miffed, as I imagine most of us would be were we in his shoes.
All of the other discussions, while interesting, are not germane. IMHO:-)

John ".16 bits worth" Neal

Larry Pieniazek wrote:

Steve Scott wrote:

Naji Norder wrote in message <36E43042.92BEBE44@computer.org>...
here are the two questions that I would put to a vote.

1.) Should someone be allowed to post, within the thread of another
seller/auctioneer,

Define "within the thread of another", please. Threads are not owned.

Therefore, yes to both questions. Now, the first may be a bit cheekier,
but it's certainly better than private emails to the bidders making
offers. Which is what you might get if you actually had a rule rather
than an norm on this.

I say, get general acceptance from the group that it's a good norm
rather than holding an election. As someone posted, I feel Todd's
silence on this is quite telling. No rule is necessary and no rule will
be forthcoming, I hope.

--
Larry Pieniazek    http://my.voyager.net/lar
Stop the FDIC from spying on us! Go to
http://www.defendyourprivacy.com and sign the petition.
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
(...) I would like to differentiate "it _is_ discourteous" from "you find it to be discourteous." Clearly, some folks do not consider it discourteous. (...) But I didn't email any bidders. (...) But I didn't contact any bidders. I posted another (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR