To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6362
6361  |  6363
Subject: 
Re: The LEGOCRATIC National Convention
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.va.new, lugnet.town, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 04:31:31 GMT
Viewed: 
15 times
  
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
"Nicholas Fezie" <NSFosaur@aol.com> wrote in message
I must disagree with you here Tim.  I believe Juniorization is actually
conservative because fewer parts are used.  Liberals would use as many
parts as possible to build models.  So that's my two cents.

If you're looking at it from the perspective of parts, yes.  But, I was
looking at it from the POV of conservatives lean towards 'older' moral
values (good sets, many pieces, _how they used to be_), where liberals seek
change from those ways (juniorization).
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com

Correct there.  Seems like the basic views of the parties are in contention
with one another.  What a great controversy...

-Nick



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The LEGOCRATIC National Convention
 
"Nicholas Fezie" <NSFosaur@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzoHut.FI1@lugnet.com... (...) are (...) parts (...) If you're looking at it from the perspective of parts, yes. But, I was looking at it from the POV of conservatives lean towards 'older' (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.va.new, lugnet.town, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR