Subject:
|
Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 00:02:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1067 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 22:58:16 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:
> ...<snip stuff>....but there remain a few questions.
Always willing to oblige.
>
> Is it polite to post a counter offer in an auction thread?
> Maybe not.
Agreed.
>
> Is it polite to respond the way you did?
I don't think so. Actually, everything but the parasite comment was ok
im my (admittedly hardened by a few years of Usenet) view. A bit
piqued, yes, but parasite is going too far, not in the least because,
well, it's a very loaded word on the Lego groups. Most other
ad-hominems would have been okay with me. It's not good argumentative
style to call someone a dickhead or whatever, but at least there's no
_specific_ negative connotations... Is anyone following what i'm
trying to say? I'm not quite sure if I even do :-)
> Should there be a RULE about it? I don't think so. Not at all.
No way. Rules should be as general as possible, and I see no way to
formulate a rule that would a) not allow the stuff under discussion b)
not disallow anything else and c) still be general. If this was turned
into a rule (other than: Use your best judgement..), Lugnet would
eventually be stifled in rules. And none of us wants to see that...
right?
Jasper "maybe it's time for bed again" Janssen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge
|
| (...) Interesting. I'm glad you posted the dictionary definition, it warms this old pedant's heart to see argument from authority. :-) I see your reasoning, I think. In your view, either you're the organism (and an appendage of the organism is the (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
