To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 581
580  |  582
Subject: 
Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 02:04:07 GMT
Viewed: 
26 times
  
<follow-up set to off-topic.debate, this probably belongs there>
Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
Hello Lugnet auction participants:

As you might have noticed, I took the liberty of responding to
this Lugnet auction thread with an offer to sell at a lesser price.
(The thread was "Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge")
I knew this might annoy the auctioneer, but I didn't think
it was unethical or discourteous, just competitive.
What do you all think?

I think the only one who could determine if it is unethical would be Todd,
since this is his site, he's the one who determines what is and isn't "right"
on it.
(That being said) I don't think it is unethical.  BMS, (1) unethical would be
e-mailing the high bidder, and telling him you'll sell him one for less
instead.  That would be asking someone to back out of an implied(written?
spoken? electronic?) contract.  You're just one of the hazards of dealing in a
free market. :)

Discourteous is a bit different, and the seller might have had an argument
there (2), but he certainly undercut any moral authority he may have had by
calling you a parasite.

My current position is that there are multiple sellers and buyers
in Lugnet, that all threads are available to all, and that
artificially keeping the price high for one seller by waiting
for the auction to finish is worse for the community than •                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
is bringing out the set when the price exceeds my sell price.

Uh-oh - I'd watch it - that's a dangerous phrase!(3) ;-)

1:by my standards

2:by asking you politely to start your own thread

3:anyone who doesn't get the reference can hunt down repeated flamings in
.debate a few weeks back (thread=CFD: e-bay)



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
James Brown wrote in message ... {snippity doo dah} (...) in a (...) Posting to the group serves the same purpose doesn't it? (...) I've retracted that comment in the interests of continuing a constructive debate :) (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
(...) If i were to email the high bidder with such an offer, I would expect him to honor his bid. I wouldn't expect him to outbid the next bidder, if someone raises his offer, though. I have been in such a situation before, and honored my bid. It's (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
Hello Lugnet auction participants: As you might have noticed, I took the liberty of responding to this Lugnet auction thread with an offer to sell at a lesser price. (The thread was "Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge") I knew this might annoy (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR