To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5738
5737  |  5739
Subject: 
Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 23 May 2000 00:32:01 GMT
Viewed: 
685 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes:
Please precisely answer with yes or no: Is it appropriate in a mixed economy
to
allocate social program dollars based on which lobbying group contributes the
most or makes the most noise on TV?

Your wording requires some clarification.  "lobbying group contributes the
most"?  In what sense?  If the lobbying group is funding the pool for social
programs, then yes they should have some say.  Just as one can earmark
donations to the United Way to a specific charity, a lobbyist group that
contributes funds to a programs pool should have the capability of earmarking
those funds.

Ummmm.... which lobbying groups are you talking about that do anything other
than stuff money in politicians' and parties' campaign funds?  I think its
pretty clear that's what Larry was getting at, not talking about people (or
groups) giving money to the government and saying "here, we'd like to help
people with this problem - earmark my/our money for it."



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) economy (...) the (...) social (...) earmarking (...) other (...) (getting ready to duck and run) Another point to raise about the issue of lobbyists getting to decide how money gets spent: If one feels that (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: [snip] (...) that (...) Ah, Hobson's choice number one. I'll choose the LAR method - coin flip says - NO. However, your question (and your eternal preaching on this subject) makes the asumption (...) (24 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR