 | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) When I originally read Shiri's post, I originally thought she had crossed the line, but then I re-read it. Her post was fine, but could have been better worded. Mark responded with obvious sarcasm that could have been misconstrued as anger if (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| I responded a bit strongly, though it -was- intended to be sarcasm. That's why I apologized... I didn't want any permanently hurt feelings. ~M (...) the (...) when (...) right (...) the (...) misconstrued as anger (...) didn't (...) very well on (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) Same here - sorry for that. I guess my post WAS badly worded (and it's not the first time either, dang, I should watch my english) and when I read Mark's reply, I got pretty heated up... sorry Mark, and apology accepted. No hard feelings? (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| :^) There, now. Let's all have some milk and cookies. (and LEGO) ~M (...) not the (...) Mark's (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) Mmmmm... sounds good. :-) Glad we got this settled, I guess we're off-topic for .debate 'coz we're agreeing <grin, duck and run>. HAND, -Shiri (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
